By Dr. Fatemeh (Sara) Zarei
Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
Social constructionism is a theory of knowledge in sociology and communication theory that examines the development of mutually constructed understandings of the world. It assumes that understanding, significance, and meaning are developed not separately within an individual, but in coordination with other human beings (3). A major focus of social constructionism is to uncover the ways in which individuals and groups participate in the construction of their perceived social reality. It involves looking at the ways social phenomena are created, institutionalized, known, and made into tradition by humans. In social constructionism, a social construct is a familiar and simple concept that may be understood in each culture differently.
Understanding an educational setting in a constructivism approach is complex. By looking at schools, we learn about the elements that are put together to form a meaningful entity called “school”. Despite the different forms of grouping in school constructs as learning units, curricula, teachers, students, and equipment and facilities, what is constant all the time is the school itself that preserves its meaning. Hence, the relation between constructs on the whole creates a meaningful educational context.
Any phenomena must be understood as whole in its context. A whole cannot be decomposed from socio- cultural context. On the other hand, all constructivists started with the insight that socio-cultural events are meaningful phenomena. Thus, for constructional understanding of the school, all the inter-element relations within a school including human resources, equipment, management styles, and organizational cultures are emphasized (4). It is in understanding these intra-structural relations that a school preserves its meaning. Based on this argument, “health in school” is comprehensible in the context. In other words, school health is revealed by the composition of parts of a construct.
Constructivism is recommended for exploring every social and cultural phenomenon. In other words, cultural elements are just formed by structural models and they are meaningless when examining the relations, similarities, and differences can only give meaning to them. Therefore, according to “institutionalization” (5) principle, a combination of health cannot be isolated from management methods, school environments, educational approaches, facilities, educational materials, and teachers’ insight. In this regard, understanding health is only possible within the social totality context and in relation to parts and elements that constitute the educational context.
Hence, a healthy behavior such as using health snacks among students at school is not understood in an equal and similar context because of complexity of socio- cultural constructs in power relations. This means that the combination of socio-cultural constructs in power relations, customs, beliefs, norms, values, and insights give meaning to a behavior. Therefore, understanding the reasons and factors that affect the formation of healthy behavior and non-healthy behavior at school is possible by taking into account the relations between elements of the school environment. So, the tools intervening creation of insight and healthy behavior at school are based on an understanding of organizational culture, norms, and values hidden in a school.
Numerous approaches exist before the creation of a culture and transforming this behavior in its correct form. Thus, a behavior must be transformed into a correct behavior using behavior transformation models based on elements of behavior including cognitive, observational, and mental-emotional elements. Furthermore, taking into account meta-cognitive factors based on intra-contextual elements within a structure are also essential. In order to define the subject, we use an example. Consuming health snacks at school is regarded as a healthy behavior. Therefore, conducting educational programs for promoting the culture of eating healthy snacks among students require this program to penetrate into all the elements of an educational structure. See Table 1 for more details.
Table1: Institutionalization for having health snacks at school
|School’s Construct||Applied example|
|Teacher||The teacher uses health snacks|
|Curriculum||Within the training, examples are about using health snacks.|
|Environment||The school offers a health snack buffet.|
|Management||Selling food items like soda, chips, and candies at school buffets is prohibited.|
|Parents||Health snacks provided by the parents will be awarded.|
|Meaning system||Having a healthy lifestyle|
|Value||Healthy eating is precious|
|Power relations||Student- teacher health, educational relationship
Parents – students’ health, educational relationship Parents – teacher, health educational relationship
Therefore, a healthy behavior is formed within the social context, so planning for the promotion of health at schools is more effective when the social totality of a phenomenon is also considered. In addition, from the perspective of behavioral psychology, approaches for discovering the constitutive elements are not only possible through quantitative and laboratory approaches, but they are also possible through understanding social and cultural infrastructures based on open and deep inquisitive approaches.
- Derry, S. J. (1999). A Fish called peer learning: Searching for common themes. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.),
- Deschesnes, M., Martin, C., & Hill, A. J. (2003). Comprehensive approaches to school health promotion: how to achieve broader implementation. Health promotion international, 18(4), 387-396.
- McMahon, M. (1997, December). Social Constructivism and the World Wide Web-A Paradigm for Learning.
- Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann. (The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Anchor, 1967; ISBN 0-385-05898-5). A paper presented at the ASCILITE Conference. Perth, Australia.
- Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American sociological review, 726-743.